Eastwick, P.W., Finkel, Elizabeth. J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2007). Choosy instead of unselective romantic focus: Not absolutely all reciprocity is made equivalent. Mental Research, 18, 317�319.

Related Suppose we customized a totally practical, independent robot one to acted to the world to complete their requirements. How could i guarantee that it can need a comparable some thing we create? Alison Gopnik examines. Discover or pay attention! Scaling Upwards Discounts: A great deal more Focused Formula Could help the hardest Strike

Eastwick, P.W., & Finkel, Elizabeth.J. (2008). Sex variations in companion tastes reviewed: Carry out people know very well what it 1st attract from inside the a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and you will Public Mindset, 94, 245-264.

Fiore, A beneficial.T., & Donath, J.S. (2005). Homophily in matchmaking: Whenever can you including individuals such as oneself? Quick Paper, ACM Computer system-Peoples Interaction 2005.

Fiore, A good T., Taylor, L S., Mendelsohn, G.An excellent., & Hearst, Yards. (2008). Determining appeal in the online dating pages. Quick Report, ACM Computer system-Person Communication 2008.

Fiore, An excellent.T., Taylor, L.S., Zhong, X., Mendelsohn, G.A beneficial., & Cheshire, C. (2010). That proper and just who produces: Individuals, pages, connections, and you will responses inside online dating. In Proceedings away from Hawai’i Worldwide Appointment for the Program Sciences, 43.

Hitsch, G.J., Hortacsu, A beneficial., & Ariely, D. (2009). Why are your mouse click: An enthusiastic empirical data from dating. Functioning Papers, recovered off:

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). If the I’m not beautiful, are you hot or otherwise not? (suite…)